Bms already OP with their great def and they phy attack + jumps so no need dph for them :3 i dont agree for that
adding attack level on dragon axe would do it
The only reason I'd say go with the CoTD blessing instead of this is because barbs would also get access to the new attack levels for the dragon axes, and strength barbs hit hard enough as it is. ;>.>But yes, I'd love to see a DPH BM become more viable. It'd be nice to be able to kill a barb without having to aps him down.
Axes can be restricted or a new set can be made purely for blademasters.Either way, attack level axes or blessing will be good.
The attack lev on dual axes is a bad idea because,as i said before,some skills that are good for dph require other weapons.A 15-20 attack lvl blessing that reduces the attack rate and maybe adds some crit(it was stated before by others that if u don't get a crit/zerk the damage is bad)or accuracy seems like the best solution so far.
Oh 15 lvl blessings, really?Lemme count- 15 atck from neck,belt,cape+8 from lucky engravings Rings-neck,belt+25 from r8 set+10from lucky r8 weapon....and + 15 atck lvl blessings?(+6 atck lvl rune)(zerkcrit included)= 79.Really? GTFO
Well mmm maybe a full rank 8 set eddited?? Just as Aga did with sins.Imo, +10 attack lvls should be enough. +35 attack lvls blessing is just mmm ignorant??....BMs are the tankiest class against ANY other class, can perma stun lock, and stuns go through expel WITHOUT any elemental damage added. DPH is not supposed to be used to take down HA users. LA either cause you can tank them for days. But i do agree DPH should be viable against AA users that camp purify wep. As for the chi reduce of the BMs debuffs just no lol. Believe me, we dont want the tankiest class with the most powerfull debuffs ingame aoe stunning everything and being still able to cast the 2 debuffs skills in dph mode with +60-70 attack lvls.