Decrease 0d chance to 10% , increase cd of pet stun/imobilize by 10s . i think its enough (i play veno)
Or just remove 0D completely and boost the primal redworm debuffs for sage and demon. 0D is literally an atrocity to have in-game
10% is still too much for a private server. More like 5% imo. Venos have enough utility as is.
I fought Eve 2 days ago, end score was 2-2. Yes she was rusty but its possible to beat her. I agree that the cc might be too much, only reason i could handle it was thx to my def gear.I personally think the cc would be ok if the pets werent this unkillable, i barely deal like 10% of its HP with 1 skill and most of the annoying cc comes from pets.But as said, veno is counter to barb and its just a pain fighting them...
i wouldnt like 0 def to be touched! since i don't find it a problem at all..
My 0pdef procs once every 50 tries
Of course you wouldn't find a problem with 0D since you're a faking barbarian
any other class would just kite! stop being clueless. only class which is massively close ranged are wb/bm/sinwb = tankbm = leap, stun, stunsin = tidal, cc of their own, kite.not to mention bm,sin can kill pet easily. and can dodge the anatomy on 0def easily. i for one do as a barbany other class is already ranged and can easily kite. not to mention their own survival abilities
Mass PK. EA x3 Sparks with IG at 2APS. AA randomly switches to you as there is 2-3 EA's already sparked and dropping bodies, the venomancer uses ironwood and proc's 0D on the unlucky target 3-4 EA's just instantly hit you the moment 0D procs ...? So much for kiting and survivability tactics. You're dead before you know what happened. It's more of an issue in mass PK, and that's the only view I'm looking at it from- as for 1v1's where you can play it off, sure you can avoid dying if you're fast enoughIf you're going to deny that the above doesn't happen you're lying to yourself. We've all been there in TW and DT, and in mass PK and have seen a party member of ours instantly go from fully buffed to dead in a fraction of a second.
decrease amount of CC obtained by pet to just one skill only, either freeze or stun
The pet cc is derived from the fact that WF is reliant on it for many aspects such as wf doesn't itself possess an arsenal of cc such as mage or other arcanes do with a multiple stuns and slowdowns, sleep, silence what not that cost fundamentally no chi at all. WF fox form freeze costs 1 spark, frost scarab (demon freezes for 3 seconds, sage doesn't) costs 1 spark and is thus largely useless to use on demon chi-wise. People like Eve use stuns for both defensive and offensive reasons, Pounce with 80% chance to stun has 1 minute CD, Heavy load has 30 seconds cd so crying about them being spammable is not relevant. It might however appear as spamming if it constantly interrupts your locks such as occult 'cause that's a reasonable way for an out at a prospect of death. Even primitive wolf's special skill Loyal dog already got CD nerf making it what not a last resort skill nowhere spammable. I do approve that pet freeze is used merely for offensive reasons and gives wf there an advantage to go full offense for a certain period and also gives a good chance to lock target, if anything should be removed it is pet freeze but again it is not that big a problem for any other class than wb, and I know you can facetank most of it anyway. Having pet cc restricted has similar effect on wf gameplay as would occult removal have on wb, play with the thought for a while. Also from wb pov it would be no big deal to increase pet dmg or defense whatsoever but for instance that would have a huge advantageous impact on wf 1v1s versus other arcanes as the pet can be accumulated to deal huge dmg already and I don't think that would be reasonable on any basis. What comes to 0d I do not care what happens to it tbh but I still don't find it a problem nowhere else but events where it can be exploited a lot
You're just bad if you die to 0def in a 1v1. Your fault for leaving your self open like that, only class that can cry about 0def is psy or mg. P.s. 100% 0def does not exist nor is possible due to it being a server side rather than client based calculation.