Due to boredom, a random but not so surprising finding was discovered. According to a simple linear model using data from the monthly pk ranking*, only cultivation and class are significant to each other. This means out of the 4 variables from the pk ranking (class, gender, cultivation, and player kills), only cultivation and class can somehow fit each other well. This further proves that how inflexible classes are when it comes to cultivation; at least this is what the pk ranking tells, and it is actually pretty consistent with the general belief. *only using data from the pk ranking for all classes
cultivation tends to just be indicative of play style (skill/passive advantages) not sure what else you're trying to prove here
The result was obtained based on a set of data that represents the top 100 players with the most kills. If you are still unsure about it, let's put it this way:Given that someone is in the ranking of top 100 players, there is a significant relationship between his class and his cultivation.
Just like the only EAs that get in pk rank as significant results are those ct/aps builtDph wont compete
?what is this tale
Nope. It does not depend on the culti/class of individuals, it is dependant on the individual skill of the player and their ability to find a way to get as many kills as possible. Certain classes with different cultis will have an advantage in certain situations but this will not impact their ability to get high ranks in PK tables simply because of their culti. In simple terms, you can't polish a turd but you can polish a gem, if the required time is put it.
This. Btw u can polish a turd.
Indeed, but all you need to do is look at yourself for the result