Class Restriction Rings

C · #1 Sept 30, 2015, 02:05 am

I know it's been discussed and requested but I was wondering if there's any definite answer on whether or not they will be restricted? Meaning AA classes cannot use Might Rings and vice-versa.

๖ۣۜĐomgrath · 1.18.16

Restrict rings
Restrict defense cape from all but barb and EP/mystic
server fixed

PedroSner · #3 Sept 30, 2015, 02:27 am

Quote from: ๖ۣۜĐomgrath

Restrict rings
Restrict defense cape from all but barb and EP/mystic
server fixed

And WR's too.
But +1 for it , even tho there will be a lot of complaining , and there will still be new issues so people will eventually cry once again. Tho i believe those 2 are doable and a must.

Mάx · #4 Sept 30, 2015, 02:30 am

+1 And remove the Will Surge from genie

C · #5 Sept 30, 2015, 02:32 am

This isn't a suggestion.

๖ۣۜĐomgrath · 1.18.16

Quote from: Mάჯ

+1 And remove the Will Surge from genie

no remove spark from genie (or heavily nerf it) and then wizards wont be 1 skill-warriors

ℬʋttɦҿαɗ · #7 Sept 30, 2015, 02:38 am

Quote from: C

I know it's been discussed and requested but I was wondering if there's any definite answer on whether or not they will be restricted? Meaning AA classes cannot use Might Rings and vice-versa.

You want most MGs to RQ their class?
Would be good idea, hard to find a MG who doesn't go full pdef set when get hit once.. 6-7k damage goes to 1k, so sad.
Probably scripters think it would be end of the world and start crying here soon.

C · #8 Sept 30, 2015, 02:45 am

Quote from: ℬʋttɦҿαɗ

You want most MGs to RQ their class?
Would be good idea, hard to find a MG who doesn't go full pdef set when get hit once.. 6-7k damage goes to 1k, so sad.
Probably scripters think it would be end of the world and start crying here soon.

No, I just wanted to know if there's a word if they're going to be restricted before I waste my money buying one for myself.

#tryhardism

𝒦𝒾𝓉𝓉𝑒𝓃 · #9 Sept 30, 2015, 02:46 am

Agatio said something along the lines of it being too much.

Too lazy to go find the quote directly, I think it was in the patch thread where he restricted the cape. Now all of the forum warriors are going to come complain about def and script again.

๖ۣۜĐomgrath · 1.18.16

Quote from: ϡ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶͜͡ℭαѕѕιℯ

Agatio said something along the lines of it being too much.

Too lazy to go find the quote directly, I think it was in the patch thread where he restricted the cape. Now all of the forum warriors are going to come complain about def and script again.

Cape restriction nerfed sins by 5% (nothing) and MG's with an even lesser reduction since they have a PDEF Shell + 15%RPD..
Rings need to be restricted in order for there to be a real change. Same with capes, with the exception of the classes that are meant to have them. BM/Barb/Mystic/EP.
Mystics, Seekers, Psychics and other DD classes shouldn't have a defense cape, let alone full defense-ring camp

Goldengate · #11 Sept 30, 2015, 03:44 am

Quote from: ϡ̶̶̶̶̶̶̶͜͡ℭαѕѕιℯ

Agatio said something along the lines of it being too much.

Too lazy to go find the quote directly, I think it was in the patch thread where he restricted the cape. Now all of the forum warriors are going to come complain about def and script again.

http://epicpw.com/index.php?topic=27256.0. Basically Agatio said

Quote

Restricting the rings isn't the simplest, because there's over 150 rings to restrict + people would lose the engraves they invested in.

And have a look at the thread I linked below:
http://epicpw.com/index.php?topic=27890.0

We already have too many non-life players investing a lot of money on virtual items. You people don't realise how many non-ending threads we will get if something like this gets implemented.

Consequences:
- Omnislasher won't be able to make a lot of profit anymore.
- Some hardcore players will commit suicide for spending countless months just to own a 4 ATT/4 DEF ring.

You all never read anything posted useful in this forum...