Ring suggestion/Bound items

[Nea]

since many people of epw rely on the broken defence brought by 1x/2x phy rings or 1/2x mdef rings on the oposite type of class
why doesnt aga add 154 strength requirement for physical rings and
154 mag for magic rings

also find way to remove bound from items pls gm ty ((((((((((9 (for donation points and to take a while to not cause items loss if account is broken or shit)
this is just a suggestion if u find it stupid dont comment
just say +1  or -1
dont start drama etc

[Elena]

Could just make them class restricted from the start, is kinda same thing....
I honestly don't care since I don't relay on phy ring so much but I doubt a lot of people would agree. :sad:

[FMP]

u consider that you won't be able to reset stats from ring anymore ? xd idk if i got this right

[Yangster]

To be honest +1 for both... I really wish it happens   less turtles in the game

[Nea]

u consider that you won't be able to reset stats from ring anymore ? xd idk if i got this right

isnt it already required to have dex on ea/sin , str on HA and mag on AAs? u will not be able to reset str anymore on any other class and is meh lol.

[Nea]

Could just make them class restricted from the start, is kinda same thing....
I honestly don't care since I don't relay on phy ring so much but I doubt a lot of people would agree. :sad:

class restrictment would remove those wannabe gods with no way to die slave healed and not let them use the oposite rings
this idea  will reduce amount of DDs that can go full def in a blink(g18 key on nerding keyboard) and switch back to dd insta
if u wanna go def more, u will sacrifice dmg, same as every1 else.

[BAQWULF]

leave everything how it is... thank you -1

[Zirkon]

+1 
I would prefer Class Restriction , but this way works too

[Neve]

well that would solve the problem for HA venos
but
wouldn't that be kinda unfair to HA/ LA classes?
AA classes do have to set 79 str anyhow, while LA/ HA classes don't have to set any mag to use their gears.
So if  a HA and  AA would wanna pay that price a AA would "just" have to set 75 extra str while a HA or LA class would actually lose 149 points from str 
or dex.
I'm still tending to -1 for restricting the rings but IF that happens i think this would be a okay solution.

[Nea]

+1
I would prefer Class Restriction , but this way works too

a lot of d... people denied that and not even gm takes it into consideration cause pleasing the majority is 'better' than making stuff balanced
this is just a way for every1 to get their piece of balance, somehow
i myself prefer class restriction, no answer on that one
hope dies last
lets hope it gets added LOL

[Аlex]

also find way to remove bound from items pls gm ty ((((((((((

THIS...q.q

[LeiTo]

Will be hard to make people understand it but:

Without restriction it make hardcore unbalanced things alot more balanced.

[inori]

class restriction to rings +1  

Unbinding items -1  (i think it defeats the original purpose of bound status)

[Nea]

class restriction to rings +1  

Unbinding items -1  (i think it defeats the original purpose of bound status)

well unbinding items is just an option for people who did a mistake binding or wanna switch toons and they gonna pay for it, help the server and bring $ to the server, i dont see the downside if, because i was dumb, i bound lets say, a 3int blackhole bow, on a sin.
i want to unbind it.
i cant tho
ill pay idk, 20 points? (10k ec) unbind it, take it
and so on. the unbinding should last more than 3 days to avoid 'item stealing' or a 'email accept' or something

[Ħǎᵯɨɖ ᴙ€ᵶⱥ]

+1 for both