People who say -1 should at least state their reasons.
I'm all for restricting physical and magic rings to their respective classes but I disagree with limiting archers, not because it's a neccessity for them but because it decreases their accuracy and doesn't influence their defence in any kind of way.
i dont see why that would be needed tbh. if you cant kill a person because its using the ring that "isnt meant for its class" then it might not be them not beeing good but you.I personaly only ever use a phys ring when im playing my cleric in mass pk ~ so i rly dont care too much i just dont see a need.Okay so ill use a 2. mag ring again, sure iill lose phys def but hey ill gain 10% channeling so w/e.I just dunno why you would see the rings as such a problem.
try killing a veno with phys rings puri wep vit tome and vit cape, its completely unbalanced
use the r8 ring as phy. use dragon as magic, you'll also get some phy reduce+ dex and str(accuracy and damage) ?