While I agree to make mobs at usual pvp spots non-aggressive, I disagree to remove them completely from the map. IMO, this suggestion is not bad, but also not necessary. There is a reason why the mobs in those areas are aggressive. In fact, they were set to be aggressive even before signets were invented. It's simply part of the game. I'm sure everyone had the same problem. Ofc it's annoying, but we all deal with the same problem. To my mind, it also makes pvp more challenging in some sense (Learning to avoid mobs when taking signet or with arcane defense). Signets already made regrouping much easier and more efficient than before. There's no reason to beg for other changes to make it even better. It's already at its best now, IMO.
Monsters have minimal impact on fps and I can guarantee you that removing few mobs while having 100 players around that are taking actively taking part in PK wouldn't make slightest difference in fps.If mobs annoy you there's Etherblade or Plume area where they are non-aggressive...
Did you read this?
I didn't know that stating facts and bringing up ideas would count as "begging".You were clearly not reading careful enough. This isn't just about mobs and signets. It's also about lag due to particle effects, space to kite and enjoyable Mass-PvP without interruptions.
Mobs wont make you lag less sorry .
Same for the Venomous Ghouls at west please ...
As a PvE player i enjoy looking at the mobs...just because it bothers u in pk doesnt mean it should be removed
Agreed. While mass-pkers (including me) do like to see the mobs being removed or made non-aggressive in the usual pk spots, there are others who enjoy their presence and their original qualities in those places. Unless it is extremely necessary or crucial, I failed to see the need to change it just to please a particular group, e.g people who do mass-pk in those areas.
Agreed here, for sure area with monsters is less boring that the one that is entirely empty.