Total Members Voted: 18
Ya.. I guess its better to have 20 vs 20 fight where only 2-3 people worry about flag and yet all others get their points even though they do all the work. Yap... That works better...
And u prefer where ppl just come and afk and they anyway take ur credits... ? lol it's same thing, this way maybe ppl will bother more about flag.
I wish thats true..
well its would be nice...but dont QQ if they did it and maybe all lands will be full so some ppl wont be able to join the fights...i think map depends on numbers of ppl who join....and maybe GMs thought of this but numbers was many? idk
What? I don't understand your reasoning.
Its sarcasm, Im sorry if it confused you. I prefer more lands because people have more options and more strategies to try out. Also as someone above mentioned: server is getting more and more people every day, if we have less lands maybe a lot of people wont be able to join battles at all and that would be a shame.
I prefer not being able to join but to be a real fight than joining when there's no1 to fight, that's the idea of nw, to get ganked while u carry flag and have ur allies protect u, not to see idiots afking cuz they too lazy to move their hand on the mouse and keyboard.
It's not that I didn't understand it was sarcasm, I just didn't understand what you said. Around 600 people show up each NW, in old NW each nation had around 20 territories at the beginning. That's more than enough to fit everyone even if we get alot more attendance. The only problem this could bring is baselocking, but I'd rather be baselocked than have a map full of 1v10 battles.