Random Finding

[アイドンノウくん]

Due to boredom, a random but not so surprising finding was discovered. According to a simple linear model using data from the monthly pk ranking*, only cultivation and class are significant to each other. This means out of the 4 variables from the pk ranking (class, gender, cultivation, and player kills), only cultivation and class can somehow fit each other well.

This further proves that how inflexible classes are when it comes to cultivation; at least this is what the pk ranking tells, and it is actually pretty consistent with the general belief.


*only using data from the pk ranking for all classes

[kitty stew]

cultivation tends to just be indicative of play style (skill/passive advantages) not sure what else you're trying to prove here 

[darkfe321]

Due to boredom, a random but not so surprising finding was discovered. According to a simple linear model using data from the monthly pk ranking*, only cultivation and class are significant to each other. This means out of the 4 variables from the pk ranking (class, gender, cultivation, and player kills), only cultivation and class can somehow fit each other well.

This further proves that how inflexible classes are when it comes to cultivation; at least this is what the pk ranking tells, and it is actually pretty consistent with the general belief.


*only using data from the pk ranking for all classes

ok                            

[アイドンノウくん]

cultivation tends to just be indicative of play style (skill/passive advantages) not sure what else you're trying to prove here

The result was obtained based on a set of data that represents the top 100 players with the most kills. If you are still unsure about it, let's put it this way:
Given that someone is in the ranking of top 100 players, there is a significant relationship between his class and his cultivation. 

[Nea]

The result was obtained based on a set of data that represents the top 100 players with the most kills. If you are still unsure about it, let's put it this way:
Given that someone is in the ranking of top 100 players, there is a significant relationship between his class and his cultivation.

Pk rank only shows DDs preferences /culti efficience of those classes in getting a kill
There can be 900sage wfs and 100demon ones
If those 100demon wfs would have 0pdef they'd be there more than sage
Same goes for mage
-99 > -79 with 10k more mag attack...
Just like the only EAs that get in pk rank as significant results  are those ct/aps built
Dph wont compete 
Ep = most are mass pk supports
Wb = no1 kills in mass pk as wb
Wr same story 
There is diversity . Those classes that u dont see their culti in 50/50 are either designed to tank/ support or just have a cultivation disadvantage( sage wr ) 

[HELLA EPIC]

Just like the only EAs that get in pk rank as significant results  are those ct/aps built
Dph wont compete

?what is this tale

[Nea]

?what is this tale

By the time u cast frost arrow i see a chinese ea already running out of skills to cast with similar dmg

[Harry]

wow it's a miracle 

[TweedleDum]

Due to boredom, a random but not so surprising finding was discovered. According to a simple linear model using data from the monthly pk ranking*, only cultivation and class are significant to each other. This means out of the 4 variables from the pk ranking (class, gender, cultivation, and player kills), only cultivation and class can somehow fit each other well.

This further proves that how inflexible classes are when it comes to cultivation; at least this is what the pk ranking tells, and it is actually pretty consistent with the general belief.


*only using data from the pk ranking for all classes

Added TL;dr for you

[Mentalista]

Since when pk ranking show the true?

[Areashi]

Due to boredom, a random but not so surprising finding was discovered. According to a simple linear model using data from the monthly pk ranking*, only cultivation and class are significant to each other. This means out of the 4 variables from the pk ranking (class, gender, cultivation, and player kills), only cultivation and class can somehow fit each other well.

This further proves that how inflexible classes are when it comes to cultivation; at least this is what the pk ranking tells, and it is actually pretty consistent with the general belief.


*only using data from the pk ranking for all classes

Nope. It does not depend on the culti/class of individuals, it is dependant on the individual skill of the player and their ability to find a way to get as many kills as possible. Certain classes with different cultis will have an advantage in certain situations but this will not impact their ability to get high ranks in PK tables simply because of their culti. In simple terms, you can't polish a turd but you can polish a gem, if the required time is put it.

[Mentalista]

Nope. It does not depend on the culti/class of individuals, it is dependant on the individual skill of the player and their ability to find a way to get as many kills as possible. Certain classes with different cultis will have an advantage in certain situations but this will not impact their ability to get high ranks in PK tables simply because of their culti. In simple terms, you can't polish a turd but you can polish a gem, if the required time is put it.

This. Btw u can polish a turd.

[kitty stew]

This. Btw u can polish a turd.

so many angles to take with this one 

[Harry]

This. Btw u can polish a turd.

Indeed, but all you need to do is look at yourself for the result

[Mentalista]

Indeed, but all you need to do is look at yourself for the result

Turn down for what.