Will the Mystic weapon, God's Seal be ever edited one day to be worth using? I mean, if you ask me, the addon (gaining health + defence) is not worth losing the attack power for Mystics. And for me, I wanted to use it on a cleric, but it's addon is seriously hapless and unworthy for many reasons. Defence addon should be upgraded to 15%
Oh pliss I nid 2 bi protecktor of epw forums oh pliss
Now it sounds like you want the defense increased on wands to make up for the fact wands have no spike damage. They are after all the magic weapon with the smallest spread in damage out of all of them. There is a reason why wiz/cleric/veno/mystic can use all these different types of weapons. If you really want a wand with uber defense lvls get R8 at 150 and stat it for defense. Changing the demonic or dragon version would only off balance its purpose in the lineup of weapon choices.
I see your point. But it's not accurate if you're replying to mine.I want it's defensive properties to be upgraded, I know that you can use r8 for def levels, the weapons don't have class restrictions, whatever. People doesn't seem to get the whole point of this topic. It's about the weapon called God's Seal, not mystics, not r8, not how Obama wins the 2012 elections, nothing else.I'm bringing this up because NOBODY uses this weapon (as main) because it's purpose (to be tanky) sucks.No one find any value in its defensive stats, that's why I want the weapon to be looked at again.
Here's the stats for the weapon, God's Seal:[Medium-Medium damage]Channeling -10%Vitality +25Physical Defense +6%Def. Level +4HP: +500Ok let's see 250+500hp=750 hp6% phys def +Verdant Shell if sage-Gains a bonus to Wood, Water, and Physical damageresistances equal to 90% of your armor.Lasts for 30 Minutes.sage-Physical Defense increased by an additional 10%. Now go and get bm buff:)and wands have the closest dmg you don't do high number crits or low.so let's see if target have 10k hp and you hit 2 2.2 dmg range in 5 hits it's dead:)with other weapons dmg would be 1.5k>2.5k? try it I', lazy to make tests nowso as I see wand is good best for pk even in 1 vs 1
kest, with alldue respect, please shut up and quit being so defensive. Notice how the gm hasnt said anything. You arent willing to collabrate and discuss in an educated manner. If you cant do that, pls dont start a thread :/
I get what you mean. But, I honestly only see the defensive properties of lacking is because of the offensive abilities of the other weapons' addons. What I mean by this is, sometimes its just better to have the extra -6% cast or +critrate next to defense, because you're not always going to need to need that defense. Here, a defensive weapon isn't going to replace an offensive weapon as a main weapon because the more offensive weapons (especially glaive imo) can work with playing defense. (i.e., healing) I tend to switch between weapons if I'm really taking a beating, but I would never, even if values were upgraded/changed, use it as my main weapon. Mostly because of the mid-low to mid-high damage though, not because of the stats themselves.Now, is that to say that the wand doesn't need an upgrade? No, I do agree with you on that. BUT, it will never replace a glaive or sword as a main weapon on a large scale because of the lack of damage-support added with the other two. Hope that made sense. I'm tired. *When I say offensive, I do mean the adds.EDIT: Another note, weapons are not class specified for a reason, and it would be wrong to call the wand a mystic weapon, because clerics use it as well. (Generally not wizards though, so call it the mysric weapon ok.) That may be whats causing some of the confusion.