Don't talk about adding value to this thread if your original suggestion had no value to begin with.You're attempting to somehow fix the economy by pumping ST into it. What do you think that's going to fix? Do you want to simulate Weimar Hyperinflation or something like that?
Amen.
Quote from: banaanilammasomfg die you religious wise catppl so mean here
omfg die you religious wise cat
ppl so mean here Thank you for observing this community around us to be mean, however from my observations I can confirm that you are a part of the community as you are mean too.Amen.
Quote from: banaanilammassorryi'm bipolarsorryi'm bipolar
sorryi'm bipolar
Any criticism is very welcome in this thread. I appreciate your contribution and I wish that you would reconsider being unconstructive with your criticism. Perhaps it would help you if I showed you how to be constructive: "The problem with your post is that it adds no value to this thread. If you say you agree with my point, then you're re-affirming my point of view and my points, however if you disagree, you should point out exactly why you do so, as that way, it adds value to the thread."Amen.
Your whole argument is based around a non-existent connection between inflation and people's propensity to consume
It is not about their ability to consume nor their desire, but the fact that their money has less and less value the more they hold onto it without investing it. Thus, free money is wasted money and it must be kept in use, whether it be by consuming or whatnot.Amen.
I have to agree with you if you're talking about a hypothetical model where there is unlimited demand and no possibility of surplus. Although we aren't, are we? People will have so much ST that they won't be able to sell it and will end up farming like 2k a week, it will completely destroy the market for ST/ST related items and have little or no affect on EC.
