this is not any different.
Do you think it is favouritism when some characters are deleted so others can have the name they desire? It's being done on a regular basis, this is not any different.
This is extremely different.....To be honest I can see Agatio giving it back to the original leader if the guild was fully dead. However, if it still had at least 10 active members I don't feel he should have gotten involved in the affairs of the players. This has happened before, but was a different scenario. However, we must overall remember that this is his server. Regardless of if we disagree with it or not, he can and will do as he pleases. Will this action kill the server? Of course not, but it will make a handful of people upset. If the old members of warning that felt Kiro was a better leader, then make a new guild with those members. There's little to no chance of this being overturned. Best if everyone moves on.Also, on the note of hijacking, the position of guild leader was given to Kiro. Regardless of conditions harpist might of outlined, leadership was still passed. That's no different than trusting someone with your account (just less severe). It's your fault if they go and screw everything up.
Nah you are not right
All i want to say Agiato is giving Warning back to harpist is the dumbest thing i ever seen you guys do.First off harpist gave Kiro lead before going to other server. His words in guild chat were "this is Kiro's guild now"Kiro then proceeded to be leader for 3 months, when harpist came back and he pulled all support and kept spamming our members to leave. When enough members have left it gave us no choise but to close warning down.You then tell kiro you will give warning back to its original owner (Gya) but instead of doing that. You log Kiro's warrior (force log him because he was actually playing it) Invited harpist to the guild, and gave him leader of a guild he abandond. What you fail to realise is that in the 3 months harpist was gone we invited alot of new members to warning. These members will all be removed because you thought it was needed to give harpist leader again. There was still 90 people in warning yesterday. These people had no intention to go anywhere but you forced there hand. Hope you are proud of that. What kind of logic is this. If you sell a car and the car is not beeing used after 3 months will you then break back into the car and retake it because the car is inactive?This is the biggest piece of favoritsme i have ever seen. It completely unacceptable you boot someone off his account to give HIS guild to someone who used to run it. You have no idea what our plans with Warning were. And it was never agreed upon by us to give it back. All of us were debating about making a post about this. Not because we are butthurt but because this is just complete and utter bs. You knew exactly what you were doing claiming you would give it to the original owner but instead giving it to harpist. You picked a side and that is something a GM should never do.Favortism is what kills a server. Hope this would be the last time you pull a stunt like this.
it brought back memories of when I first started getting into mass/group pk with Salvation.
Are u upset? You are in Outcasts, and u dare to make this thread? Warning is dead cause u both cant handle it. And harp never beg someone, the old and loyal members left.You both just stole lead at the end. And God Persas started to kick ppls out of Warning.So after that, you rly dare to make this thread?
yes. yes it is
All i want to say Agiato is giving Warning back to harpist is the dumbest thing i ever seen you guys do.
First off harpist gave Kiro lead before going to other server. His words in guild chat were "this is Kiro's guild now"
Kiro then proceeded to be leader for 3 months, when harpist came back and he pulled all support and kept spamming our members to leave. When enough members have left it gave us no choise but to close warning down.
You then tell kiro you will give warning back to its original owner (Gya) but instead of doing that. You log Kiro's warrior (force log him because he was actually playing it) Invited harpist to the guild, and gave him leader of a guild he abandond.
What you fail to realise is that in the 3 months harpist was gone we invited alot of new members to warning. These members will all be removed because you thought it was needed to give harpist leader again. There was still 90 people in warning yesterday. These people had no intention to go anywhere but you forced there hand. Hope you are proud of that.
What kind of logic is this. If you sell a car and the car is not beeing used after 3 months will you then break back into the car and retake it because the car is inactive?
This is the biggest piece of favoritsme i have ever seen. It completely unacceptable you boot someone off his account to give HIS guild to someone who used to run it. And it was never agreed upon by us to give it back.
You have no idea what our plans with Warning were.
When enough members have left it gave us no choise but to close warning down.
All of us were debating about making a post about this. Not because we are butthurt but because this is just complete and utter bs. You knew exactly what you were doing claiming you would give it to the original owner but instead giving it to harpist. You picked a side and that is something a GM should never do.
Favortism is what kills a server. Hope this would be the last time you pull a stunt like this.
It is, deleted characters have to be inactive for quite some time. I don't think you can compare this.