-3 runezzzz

[SHINIGAMI]

yes bad idea, -1.

[Areashiii]

I want int stones. Same with gof stones.

[Nea]

I want int runes. Same with gof stones.

I agree.

[Areashiii]

I agree.

I +1 this comment, and also give more int bonus

[wannabepro]

Dont try talk about MG).
Better say ur self 93 CT EA need be 96%

[Areashiii]

Dont try talk about MG).
Better say ur self 93 CT EA need be 96%

What?

[bvanharjr]

All I see after this is INT stones then +3 atk/def lvl stones bein added too.

-100 SO not needed for ANY build.

[Rumi]

All I see after this is INT stones then +3 atk/def lvl stones bein added too.

-100 SO not needed for ANY build.

if everyone that's posted so far has voted against these (int stones) why would they be a possibility in the future...

[Euikon]

50 def lvl rune pls

[Pain]

All I see after this is INT stones then +3 atk/def lvl stones bein added too.

-100 SO not needed for ANY build.

Are you mentally challenged? I am talking about runes, runes that you put on weapons, +3 atk/def already exists, actually +6 does too on this server. Int or gof runes never existed, I'm just suggesting to bring something back which is on every other server

Dont try talk about MG).
Better say ur self 93 CT EA need be 96%

You are not very intelligent. I said the reason they were removed in the first place were to make insta mage more difficult to create (back when they were actually good/OP). I said in my first post that I needed 3 more channeling, didn't specify which class, it's 96% btw 

[HELLA EPIC]

The rune isn't even game breaking and I don't play ct EA so Idc, +1 for this suggestion 

Edit: Maybe you should add them in boutique for 20 silver 

[HELLA EPIC]

Who ever wants to argue get in line and post your useless comments (when you don't even know shit about game/builds)

PS: I don't have enough time so be fast '-'

[Cynix]

3% chan is fairly harmless tbh.  3 atk lvls is probably more dangerous and we allow 6 attack levels to be put in a weapon.  Why not 3 chan.  I'm +1 for it.

[HELLA EPIC]

3% chan is fairly harmless tbh.  3 atk lvls is probably more dangerous and we allow 6 attack levels to be put in a weapon.  Why not 3 chan.  I'm +1 for it.

This is valor post 

[Pain]

3% chan is fairly harmless tbh.  3 atk lvls is probably more dangerous and we allow 6 attack levels to be put in a weapon.  Why not 3 chan.  I'm +1 for it.

I think this post is a goodied!