To me it just sounds like another event that'll create a battle of ego's.
I don't think this is a good idea, we already have a 3v3 event. What about 10, though? GM's only host 1v1/2v2/3v3/6v6 events as if we're stuck in 1.4.4 with 6 man squads and seem to turn a blind eye on 10v10/GvG event suggestions. I think an all vs all event would be awesome (something like The Hunger games but with teams), even with guild limits.I used to like the earlier Capture the flag event held in territory war area with 15v15/20v20/30v30 because massive battles require more thinking than those on a lesser scale and in my opinion are much more fun, but GM's stopped hosting those and moved capture the flag in twilight temple with 24 player limit (again supporting the fewer players per squad trend, which is not good at all in my opinion).
I am not talking an Arena event.. but an event out in the open all can watch that are on. And the reason I said 3 is because yea it seems getting more than that from each guild that is on at the time is very difficult. I know there will be problems but .. idk it just sounded like a good idea at the time Carry on ppl, have fun on game Was just a thought.
Well, that's the thing: having it open like that would cause issues. It would take a lot of manpower to be on vigil while participants are fighting to ensure that no one tries to gank.