So, I've played all classes in here so far, and I've noticed one interesting thing: having more pure damage (especially physical) is in most cases more effective than having more attack levels. So, my question is, am I the only one who noticed that Dragon Bow +12 with 2x +20 stones deals more damage than r8 bow with +24 atk lvls, 2x +dex stones when used by same archer on same target w/ and w/o buffs?
No, i know how dmg/atk lv works, as i did tests, but i will not share, MUEHUEHUEHUEHUE.
Lol, I know how they work as well, or at least how they should work.
ignoring atk/def of opponent.. Well, 24 atk lvls is 24% more dmg. But, you lose alot too. SB, int, not to mention base dmg / crit and shit as well. Assassin, R8 daggs only for Dph, and dph..thats not phy looool! so yeah, sin I understand r8 weap. Archer?xd No. You're Right Xcut
Actually, he's not right.The 5.7k was with a 27 atk lvl bow and fully charged take aim. The other one was with a dragon bow and also fully charged take aim. An atk lvl weapon's damage will always be higher than a dragon bow's damage. Atk lvl bow's damage will also always be superior to dragon bow's regardless of your culti / build.You're even more wrong than him lol.
atk bow can't debuff, its slower for those demons, less crit rate, or no chann for those Xbows - no xbow at all for r8, so lol..