Total Members Voted: 25
imo BH is fine as it is
we have an idea for this but we are working on horizons atm :/so we will think about this later on...after horizons settle down.
I snooped around on PWI and it seems like they got a BH switch; Snakey got replaced with some boss in EU and another boss got replaced too (not lunar sadly >.>) . So there's that.I can't support making certain BH's require 5-6 man squads though. Having to deal with 5 others in GV (unless you can log 6 accounts and solo it, more power to you) is enough to make some people lone wolves. I don't mind party play sometimes, but on the flip side, I function better solo--especially with me being a parent of a toddler who loves fridges too much for her own good, I kinda need to afk at random times, something that is frowned upon in most party situations.
PvE is mostly boring because theres no challenge to it, just easy and long.
wtf...BH is one of the best ways for no-donators to keep up with donators... we do it quickly for good reward and drag alts to earn ec/supply on it, there is a lot of PvE events you can do with friends, cmon...
it doesn't take 30 minutes to get all 50 alts through a BH. And there are the lone wolves who can't dual log too.
1. This way you wouldn't need alts just to keep up with donators.2. Please give me a list of PvE events that needs squad and gives good rewards. I know about GV, WS, world bosses.I want this system because I like my one and only character in this game and don't want to make any alt only to acquire more assets.With what I suggested you could achieve the same result with one character as you do with 50 alts now. And also, what about those people who doesn't want to make any alt because they like their main and stick to it (like me).Do you people even read through what I write? The current BH system would remain the same and you also had to finish them to get the extra ones I suggested. Your way of gaming wouldn't be affected, the countless alts and soloing everything.